Movie Appraisal: Graveyard Shift (1990)

We're going to Hell... TOGETHER!

Graveyard Shift is the perfect late 1980s/early 1990s horror film. And what I mean by "perfect" is that it is the representation of all that is the horror films from this period of time. From the hair, to the clothes, to the acting, everything here is wonderfully representative of this time in horror... especially the dubbing. Man, I love that dubbing where a character is heard shouting a bloodcurdling scream but is barely opening their mouth. Even the credits get into the action, having lines remixed into the music. It's absolutely wonderful. This movie also has some great lines and much better acting than you might expect from a movie of this... uh... calibre. Yeah, I'm going to use that word here. Directed by Ralph S. Singleton, and starring David Andrews as the drifter Hall, it is a fun ride of a horror movie that has some genuinely creepy moments.

So, the story, based off of a Stephen King short story of the same name from his Night Shift collection, is only somewhat like its original story with a much more upbeat ending than the story at the very least. Well, more upbeat in that somebody actually survives the underground sub-basement of the story. That really doesn't mean the story has an upbeat ending though. It's honestly pretty dark. It's one of those movies people seem to forget about easily. It's fairly similar in premise to many horror movies, but this one is so well executed that I do wish that it was better remembered. With only a 13% rating on Rotten Tomatoes, I have to wonder if that website is ever effective in telling whether a movie will be watchable or not. When Black Swan gets 87% and this great horror movie gets 13%... well, that's when I stop listening to Rotten Tomatoes (not that I ever have anyway).

Graveyard Shift starts out with an abandoned textile mill being reopened after somebody dies in the beginning, presumably from the very monster that is so central to the plot. The mill has a ton of water damage in the basement (and eventually sub-basement when the characters get there), and crews are hired to see that it all is cleaned out. The problem besides the water damage though, is that there are a ton of rats all over the basement and the mill itself. And these are no ordinary rats. They are much more than ordinary rats. They seem to have evolved in the basement of the mill to be incredibly intelligent, with at least one of them becoming a "super-rat" that is more like a giant bat creature of EVIL proportions. Throughout the movie characters are killed and eaten off by both rats and the super-rat alike. It creates tension and a great atmosphere for horror. The rat-creature is effectively terrifying, and never quite shown in full. It is like a hairless bat creature, and works to evoke terror in the viewer. It is often shown as moist, with red rivulets of moisture coming off of it at all times, probably indicative of the red water the sub-basement seems to harbor.

The rats used in the film seem to be all real rats, and the effects even besides the rats are actually all quite well done. It makes the movie much better when real things are used rather than some CGI nonsense. The acting is then related to what the actors can actually see and respond to, and it works incredibly well here. The acting is also legitimately well done, with really great performances from Brad Dourif, who plays a creepy rat exterminator, Stephen Macht, who plays the actually evil foreman/manager of the mill, Warwick, and Kelly Wolf, who plays the lead female of the movie, Jane, who is also the love interest of Hall. These three actually all have really good performances for a movie of this type. You don't expect much, and then are surprised by the great performances... at least I was. They have some really great lines too, much better than almost any given "great" movie today. (Okay, I'm a little bitter at the line-up of movies I see in today's market, okay?) Stephen Macht especially shines here as the major human antagonist as well as one of the sleaziest and most interesting characters ever put to film. His voice alone is brilliant and worth watching the film for, but honestly, I just truly enjoyed watching the man act. He definitely knows his craft. I could literally make this an entire review of how awesome Stephen Macht is in this movie, but I'd be digressing all over the place. While he is fun to watch, he is also easily hateable. And it works really well when you want him to die by the end of the film. Brad Dourif is always great, so it's hard for me to say anything else about him. He definitely has one of the best speeches in the film, but is also, sadly, absent from a good portion of the movie. Again, this movie should be seen for the performances alone, but the horror, the sets, and everything else in the movie really work quite well.

The red water under the graveyard and the mill is a nice touch even if it's never explained. I have no idea why it's red, and nobody else seems to either, but it works incredibly well at being different and interesting. The whole aesthetic of the movie is brilliant, basically being set in a crypt-set throughout the movie without the movie ever acknowledging it. It's all in the "basement" and "sub-basement" even though it always seriously looks like some creepy crypt or something. There is a beauty in the set design that is both wonderful and horrifying.

The bone pit that shows up late in the movie is also an oddity. Why are there so many bones? How can there be so many bones? Are they all human? I can't imagine they all are, although in a movie like this you'd better damn well believe they're all human. A movie like this doesn't mess around. It doesn't lightly tip-toe over the fact that a thousand people were murdered by the rats, their flesh eaten away, and their bones left in a pit in the ground. I suppose the bones could be from the graveyard too... the graveyard that sits in water inexplicably above the subterranean cave of rats and super-bat-rat. It doesn't matter that none of it makes any sense. It just matters that it looks fantastic and does work.

There are some random slowdowns throughout the movie, often highlighting ACTION SHOTS. It's a very 1990s thing to do, but is also a nice touch. I can't say that I didn't enjoy almost every ACTION SHOT even if they did feel slightly out of place. Ralph S. Singleton does a great job directing, even if this was his only movie direction. I feel like this man should be directing everything and was sad to find out he's directed almost nothing at all. He makes this movie feel like a John Carpenter movie. In the Mouth of Madness and Prince of Darkness have very similar feels to them, and They Live! has so many similarities (in some ways) that I actually have a hard time believing that Singleton didn't borrow a bit from Carpenter. And this is me praising the direction of the movie. I think Singleton did a great job making this movie feel great. I can't complain about a job well done.

The music is very good as well, definitely putting me in the mood for horror. It does a wonderful job at playing the tension up as well as exciting the movie-watcher for any particular scene. And, you know something? The scenes often work. The set-up is all very good, and the pay-off at the end is satisfying even if it is depressing. And the end of the film is incredibly gory even if it is a wonderful pay-off, but gory works for a gritty film like this. Gritty makes this film work on more levels than just cheesy 1990s horror. It makes it work as a great horror film as well as a little cheesy in parts. The funny thing is that I found this film much less cheesy and much more terrifying. But I think others might have other opinions on that.

One last thing before I do my best to recommend this film, Warwick is always there. Dude seems to always be skulking in the dark of the room, appearing whenever anybody complains. I have no idea how he does it, but every time you think something bad is going to happen or people are getting riled up, it's either going to be rat-bat-monster eating somebody, or Warwick suddenly there with his smug face on, ready to call out or backhandedly insult somebody. As I said before, this movie is worth watching for Warwick alone. He is literally the worst person on Earth, but I love this character. He's so unapologetic and terrible, and with the amount of screen-time and lines the guy gets he's almost the main character. So, seriously, watch this film for him if nothing else.

Now, I have to recommend this flick. It is a wonderful watch from beginning to end. While it does have some drier parts, it often moves at a good clip, and never overstays its welcome. Clocking at only ninety minutes long, it doesn't drag, and has enough characterization, horror, and good times to go around. It's a forgotten gem, as well as being a great movie for this time of year. It works well as a horror movie, and I just can't help putting my seal of approval on this interesting slice of the 1990s.

Movie Appraisal: The Tunnel (2011)

So, here is an absolutely wonderful "found footage" horror film. I have to admit to liking most films of this type already, even if the gimmick does wear thin at times. I really thought that Apollo 18, The Blair Witch Project, and Paranormal Activity were good films the first time I saw them though. And I'm sure there are plenty of people who would disagree with me that those films are quality. And that is an absolute shame. These are good horror flicks. They don't usually have the budget of most regular horror movies, but they really do the best they can. The biggest problem with these types of movies is the cinematography, which worked well enough in this movie. I didn't like the camera shaking all over the place. That was rough. And the prevailing moments of darkness and nothing else were a little too prevalent, but all-in-all this is a movie that works on many levels. I like it for what it is.

I can compare it to Marebito quite easily, both exploring abandoned tunnels. This film works better than that one though in almost every conceivable way. I know most people would probably rather get the impression of [REC] or the American remake Quarantine, but this movie is quite a bit different than either of them. It's very much in the realm of a movie that is set in an abandoned place. The abandoned tunnels under Sydney, Australia work wonders for a horror movie. Maybe not quite as well as the Parisian tunnels and catacombs might, but it isn't too far off.

While the movie's camerawork isn't anything special, the acting and especially the interviews that are interspersed throughout the movie with the found footage worked incredibly well. I was really digging this flick even if it was a little gimmicky. The documentary style really worked well here. It really felt like a somewhat incoherent and odd documentary, something that would have been on the Discovery or History Channels before they went to hell and reality shows. The movie had a ton of horror in it as well, coming off as a fairly paranoid experience. It was nerve-wracking, not because the characters were amazing or the story was that involving, but because the experience that they were having was really quite something. The fact that the government knew something more than they were saying was creepy enough, but when the crew discovers the evil lurking in the darkness, it's about as terrifying as a movie like this can be.

The "monster" or "creature" or whatever you'd like to call it was well done too. It didn't have a lot of camera time, and that was definitely for the best. The few times we do see it, it looks deformed and just enough wrong to make your blood run hot. I have to admit it was pretty creepy, although the more I saw of it the less creepy it became. The aesthetic as well was amazing. The look of the tunnels and what seemed like half-finished ruins or something like that really appealed to me. I love that kind of look in movies, and I think it's woefully underdone.

I don't have much more to say. I really liked this film. It may not be the scariest or the most memorable film around, but for an indie Australian horror movie, I thought it worked better than it had any right to work. I enjoyed it from beginning to end although I think you really have to be in the mood for a movie like this. The one downside to this movie is that towards the end it kind of slogs, and in a dialogue heavy movie like this, when nobody is talking and the screen is black, it's much more annoying than tense. Natasha, the lead character, starts screaming towards the end of the movie and never really stops... and that just takes me right out of the film. The whole ending really feels very piecemeal and cobbled together, never quite as good as the rest of the flick. The horror kind of fades away like it was never there. I both like that and dislike that from different views. I like it because they're safe in the light and on the surface, but I dislike it because the tension fades away so quickly, especially when I have no special fondness for the last character to die.

I don't have much else to say. It's a relatively simple movie about a news reporter and her crew trying to find some truth in Sydney's tunnels and finding so much more than they intended. While I really enjoyed it, this will not be a movie for everybody even though I think it does the found footage gimmick better than most. I thought it worked well, really doing its best to be a great little horror film. I have to recommend this one, especially if you're at all interested in this kind of movie.